Media Coverage

Is It Time to Move The Search Process In-House?

The Head-hunter, 2000, p. 1-2 - ©2000 by Executive Grapevine International Limited - Research conducted by US based Jones-Parker/Starr has revealed that the hiring frenzy in the new millennium is creating a talent drain and causing some of the Fortune 500 companies to think about the best ways to deal with the competition and demand for superior executives.  

Venture capital firms with portfolio companies and new start-ups with volume hiring needs must attract quality management.  All are casting an eye at the feasibility of creating an in-house function to take care of their staffing needs.  

Over 158 Human Resource executives offered opinions on in-house search capability in a recent survey conducted by Jones-Parker/Starr, US search consultants serving the US search market.  Slightly less than half (46%) of the firms surveyed indicate that they have already established a form of in-house capability by hiring recruiters from recruiting firms. A small group (6%) is considering this option and almost one quarter (23%) feel that in-house search capability makes no sense.  2% say they have tried it, but it did not work.  

Janet Jones-Parker commented: "In spite of the confusion about language and the definition of in-house search capability, as evident in the number of respondents who said they are satisfied with their 'staffing departments', it is clear that moving executive search in-house is an option gaining consideration.  We know that experienced search consultants are being recruited into corporations and venture capital firms."  

Cost is a significant reason to consider the in-house option, with almost half (39%) pointing to dollars as being a prime motivator. Faster hiring results (24%) and greater familiarity with the culture (24%) were sited as important reasons for bringing the search function in-house.  

As to whom the corporations would bring in to staff this position, 57% identify experience in retained executive recruiting as the most desirable background followed by experience in contingency work, 22%.  

Jones-Parker commented: "Retained search consulting experience is usually better preparation for these positions.  Retained consultants are accustomed to working in highly sophisticated, complex situations with top management.  They know how to determine the fit between experience and talent on the one hand, and culture and organizational need on the other.  They bring superb listening skills and objective judgment to the task."  

Whilst acknowledging that the Internet will play an increasingly important role in the selection of employees below $150K, (69%) outside executive recruiting will continue to be an important factor in the talent wars ahead. 

Traditional search firms will be happy to learn that the vast majority of the respondents (93%) still feel that external consultants can attract better talent at the senior management levels.  

Jones-Parker concluded: "Talent will rule.  The recruitment process, both external and internal, will continue to need fine-tuning so that companies can attract the highest quality talent."

Learn more about Executive Grapevine International Limited and The Head-hunter at http://www.executive-grapevine.co.uk.